Lab: More OWL: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
import owlrl | import owlrl | ||
from rdflib import Graph, Literal, Namespace, BNode | from rdflib import Graph, Literal, Namespace, BNode | ||
from rdflib.namespace import RDF, OWL | from rdflib.namespace import RDF, OWL, RDFS | ||
from rdflib.collection import Collection | from rdflib.collection import Collection | ||
Revision as of 08:51, 24 April 2020
Lab 13: More OWL
Topics
OWL ontology programming with RDFlib.
Tutorial
Classes and methods
In Lab 8 you have already used these OWL concepts:
- (sameAs, equivalentClass, equivalentProperty, differentFrom, disjointWith, inverseOf)
- (ReflexiveProperty, IrreflexiveProperty, SymmetricProperty, AsymmetricProperty, TransitiveProperty, FunctionalProperty, InverseFunctionalProperty),
In this lab you will mostly use the following OWL terms:
- (oneOf, unionOf, intersectionOf. complementOf)
- (Restriction, onProperty)
- (someValuesFrom, allValuesFrom, hasValue)
- (cardinality, minCardinality, maxCardinality)
- (qualifiedCardinality, minQualifiedCardinality, maxQualifiedCardinality, onClass)
OWL Restrictions
Most of the tasks today involve restrictions.
I Recommend refreshing your memories on restrictions and complex classes from the lecture notes When solving the tasks look at the notes, find the relevant OWL term/s, and try to use the same principles in python code.
Down below is an example solution of the first task: "anyone who is a graduate has at least one degree". It looks complicated, but once you understand it, the other tasks follow a similar pattern. In short: I create a blank node that is an OWL.restriction on the ex.degree property. The restriction in question is a minCardinaality restriction with the value 1. (e.g "at least one") Then I create another blank node that is for a List of all the criteria that makes a person a Graduate. In this case I say that a Graduate is the intersection of a Person and the restriction we creater earlier. Collection is essentially used to create lists and everything between [] is what is in the list (the intersections).
# anyone who is a graduate has at least one degree
br = BNode()
g.add((br, RDF.type, OWL.Restriction))
g.add((br, OWL.onProperty, ex.degree))
g.add((br, OWL.minCardinality, Literal(1)))
bi = BNode()
Collection(g, bi, [ex.Person, br])
g.add((ex.Graduate, OWL.intersectionOf, bi))
Tasks
Create or Extend a previous graph into an ontology that expresses the following using concepts from OWL (and some from RDF/RDFS):
- anyone who is a graduate has at least one degree
- anyone who is a university graduate has at least one degree from a university
- a grade is either an A, B, C, D, E or F
- a straight A student is a student that has only A grades
- a graduate has no F grades
- a student has a unique student number
- each student has exactly one average grade
- a course is either a bachelor, a master or a Ph.D course
- a bachelor student takes only bachelor courses
- a masters student takes only master courses and at most one bachelor course
- a Ph.D student takes only Ph.D and at most two masters courses
- a Ph.D. student cannot take a bachelor course
Write each of the above statements as python code using RDFlib and OWL.
Code to get started
import owlrl
from rdflib import Graph, Literal, Namespace, BNode
from rdflib.namespace import RDF, OWL, RDFS
from rdflib.collection import Collection
g = Graph()
ex = Namespace("http://example.org/")
g.bind("ex", ex)
g.bind("owl", OWL)
# anyone who is a graduate has at least one degree
br = BNode()
g.add((br, RDF.type, OWL.Restriction))
g.add((br, OWL.onProperty, ex.degree))
g.add((br, OWL.minCardinality, Literal(1)))
bi = BNode()
Collection(g, bi, [ex.Person, br])
g.add((ex.Graduate, OWL.intersectionOf, bi))
# Continue here with the other statements:
print(g.serialize(format="turtle").decode())
If You Have More Time
Populate the ontology with data. E.g like:
g.add((ex.Cade, RDF.type, ex.Graduate))
g.add((ex.Cade, ex.grade, ex.A))
Use owlrl like we did in lab 8 to infer additional triples. e.g below I print the ontology before and after the reasoning.
What has changed about e.g Cade after using owlrl?
# print without reasoning
g.serialize(destination="owl1.ttl", format="turtle")
# Infer additional triples
owl_reasoner = owlrl.CombinedClosure.RDFS_OWLRL_Semantics(g, False, False, False)
owl_reasoner.closure()
owl_reasoner.flush_stored_triples()
# # Print with reasoning
g.serialize(destination="owl2.ttl", format="turtle")